|
|
Rating | |||||||||||||
|
-3 *Failed arb. testing |
1 Horrible |
2 Bad |
3 Poor |
4 Below Average |
5 Average |
6 Above Average |
7 Good |
8 Very Good |
9 Superb |
10 Excellent |
||||
|
Did not respond to arbitration or was uncooperative |
x | x | x | |||||||||||
| Did not complete work | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||
| Completed work | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||||||
| Does what was asked | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Responds to emails | x | x | x | x | x | |||||||||
| Asks questions | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||
| Completes work on time | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||
| Thoroughly tests and debugs | x | x | x | |||||||||||
| Sends daily email updates | x | x | ||||||||||||
|
Makes suggestions to improve project |
x | |||||||||||||
| *This penalty rating is given when a coder loses arbitration because testing revealed that one or more flaws existed...and the flaw(s) had been previously and specifically denied by the Coder. This rating is only given by a Rent A Coder arbitrator, and when they deem the action to be deliberate. | ||||||||||||||